Inside DeepGreen’s Maine Subsea Data-Center Proposal
Analysis · Published October 17, 2026 · Filing deadline October 19
DeepGreen Western Passage SPV LLC proposes an underwater data center near Eastport, Maine, pairing 34 subsea compute pods with tidal generation. Its federal filing describes generators with a combined nameplate rating of up to 4.8 megawatts. The computing capacity remains unspecified in the notice.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission accepted the preliminary-permit application for filing in August. Comments, requests to intervene and competing filings are due October 19. DeepGreen is seeking priority to pursue a license while it studies the project’s feasibility. Building it would require separate approval.
A turbine rating is only one part of the design
FERC’s August 25 notice lists up to 16 marine turbine-generators, each rated at 300 kilowatts. Together, the turbines would have a combined rated capacity of up to 4.8 MW. The notice also describes a 1.5-mile combined power-and-fiber cable and a captive generation loop without a grid connection.
That rating does not show how much electricity the turbines would produce over time, how steadily they would supply it or how much would reach the servers. The notice does not specify the computing equipment’s power requirements.
Earlier reporting described larger design concepts. The Maine Monitor’s August 21 account reported a revised maximum of 15 MW, down from an earlier 51 MW proposal. It is unclear how those earlier designs relate to the equipment listed in the federal notice. The full amended application would be needed to reconcile the figures.
The next federal decision concerns priority
A preliminary permit would give DeepGreen priority to file a license application while it studies feasibility. FERC’s notice says that even an issued preliminary permit would not authorize land-disturbing activities or entry onto others’ land or water without permission. Acceptance of the application is an earlier step.
The Maine Monitor reported in September that Louis Wolfson described the permit as permission to study, rather than to construct. The project’s start date, financing and customer commitments remain unclear.
Local restrictions remain a separate question
Eastport’s council approved a ban on large-scale data centers on September 9 and authorized the city to seek a formal role in FERC’s review. Its signed September 22 letter requests denial of the preliminary permit and says the ordinance includes underwater centers within the areas covered by its provisions.
The same letter anticipates work to strengthen and clarify local protections. The ban’s offshore reach and its relationship to federal authority remain unclear.
The participants and the next records to watch
FERC’s decision on the preliminary permit is the next major milestone after the October 19 filing deadline. Further studies could clarify the project’s phases, power supply and technical performance. Construction approvals, financing and commercial agreements would give a clearer picture of its prospects.
The federal notice names DeepGreen Western Passage SPV LLC as applicant and Louis Wolfson as its contact. The Maine Monitor reports that ORPC, the Maine tidal-energy company, says it is not affiliated with the project. The reviewed records do not establish ownership behind the applicant or identify committed financing or signed supplier or customer agreements. Western Passage remains a proposed project.
Western Passage project profile · Explore the FJI evidence · Track the next checkpoint · Maine project directory
Sources and claim verification · 6 documents
Six distinct documents: the FERC notice, two separate municipal records, two original Maine Monitor reports and an independently reported Quoddy Tides council account. The two Monitor reports share one newsroom. Government descriptions of the application establish proposed scope, not demonstrated engineering. The complete amended application and an authoritative corporate ownership disclosure were not retrieved.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · 2026-08-25
FERC accepted the preliminary-permit application of DeepGreen Western Passage SPV LLC for filing. Its notice lists 34 compute pods and up to 16 tidal turbine-generators rated 300 kW each, in a captive generation loop without a grid connection. A preliminary permit, if issued, confers filing priority, not construction authority. Comments and competing filings are due October 19, 2026 at 5 p.m. Eastern.
FR Doc. 2026-17254, dated August 19 and published August 25; Federal Register pp. 54868–54869. Project No. 15424-000. · Reviewed 2026-10-17
- City of Eastport · 2026-09-09
Council approved the citizen petition prohibiting large-scale data centers by a 5–0 vote and authorized the city manager to seek intervention and prepare an opposition letter in FERC docket P-15424. These are municipal actions, not a FERC decision or proof of construction.
Minutes p. 2, item VI(a); p. 3, item VII(g). · Reviewed 2026-10-17
- Eastport City Council · 2026-09-23
The signed council letter asks FERC to deny the preliminary permit. It confirms the September 9 ban includes underwater centers within the areas covered by its provisions and says further strengthening and clarification are expected. It acknowledges a preliminary permit would not authorize construction.
Signed letter pp. 1 and 3–4; city posting dated September 23. Scanned original read with OCR and pivotal wording visually checked. · Reviewed 2026-10-17
- The Maine Monitor / Melissa S. Razdrih · 2026-08-21
Original reporting describes the revised proposal and interviews FERC, the developer and ORPC. ORPC expressly disclaims a project affiliation. Reported 15 MW and earlier 51 MW concepts are not treated as verified IT capacity or added to the notice’s listed generation equipment.
Project revisions paragraphs; ORPC statement and direct CEO response; FERC clarification of application acceptance. · Reviewed 2026-10-17
- The Maine Monitor / Melissa S. Razdrih · 2026-09-11
Reporting on the September 9 council meeting corroborates adoption and the intervention request, records questions about the ordinance’s geographic scope, and attributes the developer’s acknowledgment that a study permit is distinct from construction permission.
Council motions, developer statement, ordinance adoption and geographic-scope discussion. · Reviewed 2026-10-17
- The Quoddy Tides / Catherine J.S. Lee · 2026-09-11
A separate newsroom reports the September 9 ordinance vote and intervention authorization and explains that application acceptance does not mean a preliminary permit was granted.
September 11 article, opening paragraphs and federal review explanation; full accessible article read. · Reviewed 2026-10-17
Based on public records and original published reporting. No original interviews, site visits or claim of independent engineering verification.
Following AI infrastructure? Bookmark Fjord Journal for sourced reporting on projects, power and capital.
