Expanded investment research / New Albany / Beech Road campus, Ohio

QTS New Albany 1: establish delivery before estimating returns

FJI source-qualified: four-document gate met, including project-specific government evidence. Qualification evidence and decisions →

Project status: Operator lists DC1 and DC2; commissioned capacity not established here. Capacity scope: Current comparable IT capacity not established in reviewed profile. How we verify evidence.

← Back to project index

Compare this project → · Track milestones → · How to read the evidence labels

Research snapshot
Location
New Albany / Beech Road campus, Ohio
Readiness
Existing facility / readiness unverified
Status
Operator lists DC1 and DC2; commissioned capacity not established here
Confirmed companies
QTS
Next milestone
Building-specific completion, electrical acceptance and contracted capacity
Reviewed
October 6, 2026

Expanded analysis · Original disclosures linked below · CAD and USD preserved as labeled · Company statements attributed; interpretations labeled.

The one-minute investment takeaway

Our analysis: New Albany 1 requires a building-level evidence chain. The operator provides property identifiers and a campus offering, but not enough information to calculate present rent or utilization. The next useful disclosure is a dated delivery milestone tied to a specific building and power quantity.

Readiness basis: Classification of evidence in the reviewed profile; strongest documented phase, not full-campus completion. Operator lists DC1 and DC2; commissioned capacity not established here Readiness source →

What the sources establish

Who receives the money?

Our analysis of disclosed roles. Revenue routes are business-model interpretations, not estimates of booked project revenue.

Company / exposureEconomic roleWhat investors need to establish
QTSPotential wholesale facility rent and service contributionBuilding-specific leases and delivered capital; campus marketing is insufficient.
Power and infrastructure counterpartiesPotential enabling works and electricity receiptsNamed service agreements, capacity acceptance and recoverable investment.
Construction and equipment suppliersPotential upfront procurementActual awarded contracts and scope; do not derive orders from building count.

How financially meaningful is it? Analyst interpretation

Our analysis: two buildings may share enabling costs but enter service at different dates. Model each lease commencement separately while including a fair allocation of roads, substations and other common works. A community contribution has a different purpose and scale from construction spending. Investors should avoid both counting that contribution as capital evidence and treating public relations activity as evidence of tenant demand.

How to test the economicsHypothetical model · not reported results

Campus development yield = stabilized net property contribution divided by all allocated delivery capital. Financing carry during the gap between spending and accepted delivery lowers the effective return.

Hypothetical illustration: USD 150 million spent before delivery at a 7% annual financing cost incurs USD 10.5 million over a year. A six-month delay adds USD 5.25 million if that balance stays outstanding. These figures are not New Albany financing.

Milestones that would change the assessment

MilestoneEvidence to watch
Property reconciliationConsistent building identifiers in permits, commissioning and tenant disclosures.
Power and occupancyDated electrical acceptance, ready-for-service capacity and customer billing commencement.
Capital allocationConstruction and common-infrastructure costs reconciled to the delivered phases.

What could break the investment case?

Our analysis: A campus listing can be mistaken for proof that both buildings are fully commissioned. Utility and customer schedules may diverge, leaving completed capital idle. Regional infrastructure enthusiasm does not establish this property’s customer concentration, tariff or return.

What would change our view?

Our analysis: Dated building completion and enforceable customer commitments would strengthen the case. Unresolved utility timing, speculative fit-out or escalating shared costs would weaken it. Current operating evidence would improve confidence more than a broader market growth statistic.

What remains unknown Not established in this review

Present building status, energized and billable MW, tenants, budget, lease rates, financing, utility capacity agreements and construction awards remain unestablished by the cited listing.

Project research for information, not a buy recommendation. Financial illustrations use assumptions, not disclosed site results or management guidance.

Additional source evidence

Doral Chenoweth / Columbus Dispatch / USA TODAY Network via Imagn; distributedReutersConnect. Original ColumbusDispatch/USA TODAY photojournalism identifies the 1235 Beech Road site in May 2026. This is partner material distributed by Reuters Connect, not Reuters reporting or evidence of commissioned MW. The city report identifies NAL1 DC1/DC2 at 1235/1225 Beech Road; 675 Beech belongs to NAL2.

Company investor information & quarterly statements

Corporate-disclosure certification held: Research packet retains a corporate disclosure hold.; Private participant disclosure/ownership exception remains unresolved.

Blackstone

Investment manager / managed-fund exposure; not a claim that listed parent owns the campus directly

Official investor & shareholder information · Quarterly financial statements: 2026 Q2

QTS: held-public-quarterly-disclosure-not-established

Corporate disclosures provide company-wide context. They do not establish this project’s revenue, spending, profit, ownership share or operating capacity. Disclosure verification records →

Scoped FJI evidence check · October 16, 2026

Target: Reviewed current facility listing provides no dated new-phase delivery target or building-level commissioning checkpoint; existing marketed configuration retained without inferring current energized MW.

Dated evidence: Operator lists DC1 and DC2; commissioned capacity not established here

Still open: Present building status, energized and billable MW, tenants, budget, lease rates, financing, utility capacity agreements and construction awards remain unestablished by the cited listing. Historical DCD144MW/675Beech Road campus plan requires address/phase crosswalk to current DC1/DC2; do not transfer historical envelope automatically.

Sources: q.com · DCD

Field-level review; original whole-profile dates and readiness classification retained. FJ Intelligence record →

Company research: documented roles

Follow the company profile for financial context. The evidence supports the specific role described here.

Role evidence does not establish project revenue, ownership economics, accepted capacity or a percentage of company sales.