Expanded investment research / Orangeburg, New York

DataBank LGA3: nearly leased is stronger than merely built

FJI qualification held or pending: the full four-document gate, including project-specific government evidence, has not yet been accepted. Qualification evidence and decisions →

Project status: Fully operational and nearly fully leased at May 2025 opening; current metrics undisclosed. Capacity scope: Current comparable IT capacity not established in reviewed profile. How we verify evidence.

← Back to project index

Compare this project → · Track milestones → · How to read the evidence labels

Research snapshot
Location
Orangeburg, New York
Readiness
Operating
Status
Fully operational and nearly fully leased at May 2025 opening; current metrics undisclosed
Confirmed companies
DataBank; AECOM/Tishman, named general contractor
Next milestone
Updated billable utilization, customer concentration and separate LGA4 commitments
Reviewed
October 6, 2026

Expanded analysis · Original disclosures linked below · CAD and USD preserved as labeled · Company statements attributed; interpretations labeled.

The one-minute investment takeaway

Our analysis: LGA3 has both delivery and dated leasing evidence, making the financial question more specific than for a proposed campus. Investigate lease commencement, margins and concentration. The nearby LGA4 growth story remains a separate investment decision and should not be included in LGA3’s existing earnings.

Readiness basis: Classification of evidence in the reviewed profile; strongest documented phase, not full-campus completion. Fully operational and nearly fully leased at May 2025 opening; current metrics undisclosed Readiness source →

What the sources establish

Who receives the money?

Our analysis of disclosed roles. Revenue routes are business-model interpretations, not estimates of booked project revenue.

Company / exposureEconomic roleWhat investors need to establish
DataBankRecurring facility rent and service economicsBilling commencement, concessions, customer mix and maintenance obligations.
AECOM/TishmanConfirmed construction roleAward value, recognition timing and margin; role alone does not quantify earnings.
Unnamed cloud customerComputing deployment and demandIdentity and contractual obligations are undisclosed; do not assign a specific cloud stock.

How financially meaningful is it? Analyst interpretation

Our analysis: leasing reduces demand uncertainty, but “nearly fully leased” can include capacity whose rent starts later or requires additional owner-funded work. One large customer may create efficient operations and predictable cash flows while increasing credit and renewal concentration. Separate initial development profit, recurring property cash generation and any future expansion spending.

How to test the economicsHypothetical model · not reported results

Recurring contribution = billable lease revenue plus net service margin minus unrecovered operating costs and recurring capital. Signed leasing, actual billing and customer electrical draw are distinct measurements.

Hypothetical illustration: USD 20 million contracted annual rent with 10% temporarily not billable produces USD 18 million before other adjustments. The USD 2 million gap demonstrates commencement risk; neither number is an LGA3 disclosure.

Milestones that would change the assessment

MilestoneEvidence to watch
Leasing to billingUpdated ready-for-service and rent-paying capacity rather than repeating the opening claim.
Customer durabilityContract duration, concentration, credit protection and renewal terms.
LGA4 separationIndependent budget, permits, power and customer commitments before valuing the next facility.

What could break the investment case?

Our analysis: Heavy dependence on a cloud tenant can expose the owner to concentrated renewal negotiations. High-density service can demand continuing capital even after opening. Counting LGA4 as delivered capacity would exaggerate current scale and conceal future funding requirements.

What would change our view?

Our analysis: Stable billable utilization, retention and well-compensated technical upgrades would strengthen the case. Deferred rent, expensive owner-funded changes or concentrated customer departures would weaken it. An opening ceremony is historical delivery evidence, not a recurring financial report.

What remains unknown Not established in this review

Current occupancy, billable MW, rental rates, tenant identity, site capital cost, operating margin, contractor award economics and LGA4 commitments remain undisclosed in the announcement.

Project research for information, not a buy recommendation. Financial illustrations use assumptions, not disclosed site results or management guidance.

Company investor information & quarterly statements

Corporate-disclosure certification held: DataBank: private-or-nonlisted-exception

DataBank

Project / facility operator identified in project-specific source; ownership economics and tenant contracts not certified

Disclosure verification held: Official investor and quarterly document coverage remains incomplete.

AECOM

General contractor identified by DataBank opening release

Official investor & shareholder information · Quarterly financial statements: FY2026Q3 ended June30 2026

Corporate disclosures provide company-wide context. They do not establish this project’s revenue, spending, profit, ownership share or operating capacity. Disclosure verification records →

Scoped FJI evidence check · October 16, 2026

Target: Historical early2025 opening target; DataBank May22 2025 opening actual issuer checkpoint. Current listing20MW design, not current occupancy.

Dated evidence: Fully operational and nearly fully leased at May 2025 opening; current metrics undisclosed

Still open: Current occupancy, billable MW, rental rates, tenant identity, site capital cost, operating margin, contractor award economics and LGA4 commitments remain undisclosed in the announcement.

Sources: www.databank.com · DataBank · DCD

Field-level review; original whole-profile dates and readiness classification retained. FJ Intelligence record →

Company research: documented roles

Follow the company profile for financial context. The evidence supports the specific role described here.

Role evidence does not establish project revenue, ownership economics, accepted capacity or a percentage of company sales.